Ohio State is in the process of revising websites and program materials to accurately reflect compliance with the law. While this work occurs, language referencing protected class status or other activities prohibited by Ohio Senate Bill 1 may still appear in some places. However, all programs and activities are being administered in compliance with federal and state law.

Seminar: Hu McCulloch

Statistics Seminar
October 7, 2010
All Day
209 W. Eighteenth Ave. (EA), Room 170

Title

Posterior Confidence Intervals in Linear Calibration Problems: Calibrating the Thompson Ice Core Index

Speaker

Dr. Hu McCulloch, The Ohio State University

Abstract

In calibration problems, an exogenous state variable and an endogenous response variable or proxy are both observed in a set of calibration observations. We wish to make inferences about the unobserved state variable from an additional observation on the response variable under a diffuse prior. Hoadley (1970) argued that an informative prior is required in order to obtain a proper posterior distribution. Hunter and Lamboy (1981) proposed a solution, but were sharply criticized at the time. This paper presents a new derivation of the Hunter-Lamboy posterior distribution under a diffuse prior that meets these objections. At the same time, it is shown that Hoadley's approach was based on a subtle inconsistency in the application of Bayes' Rule.

The reinstated Hunter-Lamboy posterior is applied to the problem of calibrating the ice core index of Thompson et al. (2003) to instrumental temperatures. It is found, contrary to the famous claim of Gore (2006), that this index is in fact uninformative about the question of whether Medieval Warm Period was warmer or cooler than the present.

It is shown that the "classical" confidence intervals proposed by Fieller (1954) are a good approximation to the posterior confidence intervals when the calibration slope coefficient is highly significant relative to the desired confidence interval tail probability. However, when the slope is only marginally significant, the Fieller intervals become increasingly distorted and then meaningless. The proposed posterior confidence intervals simply become wider as the slope loses significance, but remain bounded.

Extensions to multiple proxies, sequentially organized data and prior restrictions on the calibration slope coefficient are outlined but not implemented.

Read his full paper: Calibrating the Thompson ice core index [pdf]

 

[pdf] - Some links on this page are to Adobe .pdf files requiring the use of Adobe Reader. If you need them in a more accessible format, please contact webmaster@stat.osu.edu.