Ohio State is in the process of revising websites and program materials to accurately reflect compliance with the law. While this work occurs, language referencing protected class status or other activities prohibited by Ohio Senate Bill 1 may still appear in some places. However, all programs and activities are being administered in compliance with federal and state law.

Seminar: Mallik Rettiganti

Statistics Seminar
January 21, 2010
All Day
209 W. Eighteenth Ave. (EA), Room 170

Title

Power Analysis for Clinical Trials Using Negative Binomial Models with Application to Multiple Sclerosis Count Data

Speaker

Mallik Rettiganti, The Ohio State University

Abstract

A key variable of interest in the study of the disease progression of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based brain lesion count. Univariate and bivariate negative binomial distribution (NB and BNB) can satisfactorily model such count data.

For RRMS Parallel Group (PG) and Baseline versus Treatment (BVT) trials, Nauta et al. (1994) and Sormani et al. (2001) propose the use of nonparametric tests and do power analyses to compare the mean MRI counts. For the PG trials, Aban et al. (2009) have proposed approximate likelihood-based tests such as the likelihood ratio test (LRT), Rao's score test (RST) and Wald tests that use asymptotic chi-square critical values.

These tests work well for large sample sizes but fail to maintain the desired significance level for small sample sizes. In this talk we describe exact parametric tests to compare the group means for the PG trials using the NB model. Using the BNB model we develop parametric tests to compare means of the baseline and treatment periods. Using these tests we perform power analyses and sample size estimation for the PG and BVT trials. We also carry out a robustness study for the PG trial. Generally, the LRT and one of the Wald tests with exact critical values perform well.